45 research outputs found

    Computer vision profiling of neurite outgrowth mordphodynamics reveals spatio-temporal modularity of Rho GTPase signaling

    Get PDF
    Neurite outgrowth is essential to build the neuronal processes that produce axons and dendrites that connect the adult brain. In cultured cells, the neurite outgrowth process is highly dynamic, and consists of a series of repetitive morphogenetic sub-processes (MSPs), such as neurite initiation, elongation, branching, growth cone motility and collapse (da Silva and Dotti 2002). Neurons also actively migrate, which might in part reflect neuronal migration during brain development. Each of the different MSPs inherent to neurite outgrowth and cell migration is likely to be regulated by precise spatio-temporal signaling networks that control cytoskeletal dynamics, trafficking and adhesion events. These MSPs can occur on a range of time and length scales. For example, microtubule bundling in the neurite shaft can be maintained during hours, while growth cone filopodia dynamically explore their surrounding on time scales of seconds and length scales of single microns. This implies that a correct understanding of these processes will require analysis with an adequate spatio-temporal resolution. The Rho family of GTPases are signaling switches that regulate a wide variety of cellular processes, such as actin and adhesion dynamics, gene transcription, and neuronal differentiation (Boguski and McCormick 1993). Rho GTPases are activated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), and are switched off by GTPase activating proteins (GAPs). Upon activation, Rho GTPases can associate with effectors to initiate a downstream response. Current models propose that Rac1 and Cdc42 regulate neurite extension, while RhoA controls growth cone collapse and neurite retraction (da Silva and Dotti 2002). However, until now the effects of Rho GTPases on neurite outgrowth have mostly been assessed using protein mutants in steady-state experiments, most often at late differentiation stages, which do not provide any insight about the different MSPs during neurite outgrowth. However, our proteomic analysis of biochemically-purified neurites from N1E-115 neuronal-like cells (Pertz et al. 2008), has suggested the existence of an unexpectedly complex 220 proteins signaling network consisting of multiple GEFs, GAPs, Rho GTPases, effectors and additional interactors. This is inconsistent with the simplistic view that classical experiments have provided before. In order to gain insight into the complexity of this Rho GTPase signaling network, we performed a siRNA screen that targets each of these 220 proteins individually. We hypothesized that specific spatio-temporal Rho GTPase signaling networks control different MSPs occurring during neurite outgrowth, and therefore designed an integrated approach to capture the whole morphodynamic continuum of this process. Perturbations of candidates that lead to a similar phenotype might be part of a given spatio-temporal signaling network. This approach consisted of: 1) A high content microscopy platform that allowed us to produce 8000 timelapse movies of 660 siRNA perturbations; 2) A custom built, computer vision approach that allowed us to automatically segment and track neurite and soma morphodynamics in the timelapse movies (collaboration with the group of Pascal Fua, EPFL, Lausanne); 3) A sophisticated statistical analysis pipeline that allowed the extraction of morphological and morphodynamic signatures (MDSs) relevant to each siRNA perturbation (collaboration with the group of Francois Fleuret, IDIAP). Analysis of our dataset revealed that each siRNA perturbation led to a quantifiable phenotype, emphasizing the quality of our proteomic dataset. Hierarchical clustering of the MDSs revealed the existence of 24 phenoclusters that provide information about neurite length, branching, number of neurites, soma migration speed, and a panel of additional morphological and morphodynamic features that are more difficult to grasp using visual inspection. This complex phenotypic space can more easily be understood when classified according to the first 4 features. Our screen then suggests the existence of 4 major morphodynamic phenotypes that define distinct stages of the neurite outgrowth process. These consist of phenotypes with short neurites, multiple short neurites, long neurites, and long and branched neurites. Further subdivision using the other features provides more information, with cell migration features being very often affected. This implies a high overlap between the signaling machinery that regulates the neurite outgrowth and cell migration processes. The high phenotypical redundancy (24 clusters for 220 candidate genes) provides only limited information to deduce unambiguous signaling networks regulating distinct MSPs. Further knowledge acquired from other approaches we used to study Rho GTPase signaling (FRET biosensors, and other live cell imaging techniques), made us realize that some morphodynamic phenotypes can only be understood when growth cone dynamics are inspected at a much higher resolution. For this purpose, we decided to further investigate a defined subset of genes using high resolution live cell imaging and a custom built growth cone segmentation and tracking pipeline for accurate quantification (collaboration with the group of Gaudenz Danuser, Harvard Medical School, Boston). These results shed light into how distinct cytoskeletal networks enabling growth cone advance can globally impact the neurite outgrowth process. A clear understanding of spatio-temporal Rho GTPase signaling will therefore require multi-scale approaches. Our results provide the first insight into the complexity of spatio-temporal Rho GTPase signaling during neurite outgrowth. The technologies we devised and our initial results, pave the way for a systems biology understanding of these complex signaling systems

    Automated quantification of morphodynamics for high-throughput live cell time-lapse dataset

    Full text link
    We present a fully automatic method to track and quantify the morphodynamics of differentiating neurons in uorescence time-lapse microscopy datasets. While previous efforts have successfully quantified the dynamics of organelles such as the cell body, nucleus, or chromosomes of cultured cells, neurons have proved to be uniquely challenging due to their highly deformable neurites which expand, branch, and collapse. Our approach is capable of robustly detecting, tracking, and segmenting all the components of each neuron present in the sequence including the nucleus, soma, neurites, and filopodia. To meet the demands required for high-throughput processing, our framework is designed tobe extremely effcient, capable of processing a single image in approximately two seconds on a conventional notebook computer. For validation of our approach, we analyzed neuronal differentiation datasets in which a set of genes was perturbed using RNA interference. Our analysis confirms previous quantitative findings measured from static images, as well as previous qualitative observations of morphodynamic phenotypes that could not be measured on a large scale. Finally, we present new observations about the behavior of neurons made possible by our quantitative analysis, which are not immediately obvious to a human observer

    Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)1.

    Get PDF
    In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field

    Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Get PDF

    Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Get PDF
    In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. For example, a key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process versus those that measure fl ux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process including the amount and rate of cargo sequestered and degraded). In particular, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation must be differentiated from stimuli that increase autophagic activity, defi ned as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (inmost higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium ) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the fi eld understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. It is worth emphasizing here that lysosomal digestion is a stage of autophagy and evaluating its competence is a crucial part of the evaluation of autophagic flux, or complete autophagy. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation it is imperative to delete or knock down more than one autophagy-related gene. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways so not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field

    Mal'cev products in the general theory of semilattice sums of algebras

    No full text
    Semilattice sums are a class of algebraic construction techniques for building new algebras out of families of similar structures arranged over a semilattice. The present thesis is intended to study the strong connection holding between semilattice sums and the notion of Mal’cev product

    Automated Quantification of Morphodynamics for High-Throughput Live Cell Imaging Datasets

    Get PDF
    Abstract. We present a fully automatic method to track and quantify the morphodynamics of differentiating neurons in fluorescence time-lapse microscopy datasets. While previous efforts have successfully quantified the dynamics of organelles such as the cell body, nucleus, or chromosomes of cultured cells, neurons have proved to be uniquely challenging due to their highly deformable neurites which expand, branch, and collapse. Our approach is capable of robustly detecting, tracking, and segmenting all the components of each neuron present in the sequence including the nucleus, soma, neurites, and filopodia. To meet the demands required for high-throughput processing, our framework is designed to be extremely efficient, capable of processing a single image in approximately two seconds on a conventional notebook computer. For validation of our approach, we analyzed neuronal differentiation datasets in which a set of genes was perturbed using RNA interference. Our analysis confirms previous quantitative findings measured from static images, as wel

    Machine learning-based tools to model and to remove the off-target effect

    No full text
    A RNA interference, also called a gene knockdown, is a biological technique which consists of inhibiting a targeted gene in a cell. By doing so, one can identify statistical dependencies between a gene and a cell phenotype. However, during such a gene inhibition process, additional genes may also be modified. This is called the "off-target effect". The consequence is that there are some additional phenotype perturbations which are "off-target". In this paper, we study new machine learning tools that both model the cell phenotypes and remove the "off-target effect". We propose two new automatic methods to remove the "off-target" components from a data sample. The first method is based on vector quantization (VQ). The second method we propose relies on a classification forest. Both methods rely on analyzing the homogeneity of several repetitions of a gene knockdown. The baseline we consider is a Gaussian mixture model whose parameters are learned under constraints with a standard Expectation-Maximization algorithm. We evaluate these methods on a real data set, a semi-synthetic data set, and a synthetic toy data set. The real data set and the semi-synthetic data set are composed of cell growth dynamic quantities measured in time laps movies. The main result is that we obtain the best recognition performance with the probabilistic version of the VQ-based method

    Automated profiling of growth cone heterogeneity defines relations between morphology and motility.

    Get PDF
    Growth cones are complex, motile structures at the tip of an outgrowing neurite. They often exhibit a high density of filopodia (thin actin bundles), which complicates the unbiased quantification of their morphologies by software. Contemporary image processing methods require extensive tuning of segmentation parameters, require significant manual curation, and are often not sufficiently adaptable to capture morphology changes associated with switches in regulatory signals. To overcome these limitations, we developed Growth Cone Analyzer (GCA). GCA is designed to quantify growth cone morphodynamics from time-lapse sequences imaged both in vitro and in vivo, but is sufficiently generic that it may be applied to nonneuronal cellular structures. We demonstrate the adaptability of GCA through the analysis of growth cone morphological variation and its relation to motility in both an unperturbed system and in the context of modified Rho GTPase signaling. We find that perturbations inducing similar changes in neurite length exhibit underappreciated phenotypic nuance at the scale of the growth cone
    corecore